Right away I should mention that Coyote’s Guide is not written specifically for classroom teachers and administrators. The full title is “Coyote’s Guide to Connection with Nature“. The authors hope to bring children back to a relationship with nature. “No child left inside” and “cure for nature deficit disorder” are common statements with this book.

So why am I recommending this as a book for educators?

The answer to this is a story. Like all stories, this one has to be given it’s proper time and place to be spoken and heard. I’m not sure if this is the time (or even the place). Simply, I came across the tools, and more importantly, the philosophy people who mentored me in working with youth. I was immediately struck by the power of it. It respects the student as well as the teacher. Because of this I searched more eagerly to learn about Coyote Mentoring and have been using it in my school, in my teaching, and in my counseling.

Coyote Mentoring is an ancient method for teaching: passing knowledge and skills from one generation to the next. It seeks to help people re-connect with their senses, learn about their thinking, use their imagination. It seeks to increase a person’s awareness. Coyote mentoring begins by finding where the student is at in his current situation. This is something that we also see in many modern counseling theories and teaching strategies. Whether it is a KWL chart or a pretest, the goal is the same. A common tool you will see is storytelling. Getting the student to tell his story gives the mentor a chance to learn, find edges, and certainly find blank spots. What is the person failing to notice? What is his awareness missing.

Once that connection is made Coyote Mentoring is done through flexibility and spontenaity. There are many tools through out the book. Building a library of tools is something many good educators already do. They bring their talent to choose the right tool for the right student or time. Coyote Mentoring is not new in this way.

Calling on the spirit of the Coyote, the authors suggest that our purpose is similar to the mammal’s habits. Coyotes live at the edge of civilization. He entices others away from their comfort area. He works these edges and in doing so we find ourselves exploring a bit more. Other counseling and teaching methods talk about expanding students’ visions or horizons, widening circles, expanding knowledge. This is the same. The difference is in the subtly that a coyote utilizes. And so, a Coyote Mentor looks for the edges in his pupil(s).

I try to “circle” a student who is having difficulties or trouble. What are they saying? What is their body language telling me? What am I missing or that they are not totally revealing?

Sometimes we expect students to trust us immediately. Aren’t we trustworthy? We won’t be teachers if people couldn’t trust us? But students need to get to know us. Giving them some space as they explore (and we explore with them) is one way to build trust.

And it works great when students are even happy or excited. “Circle” and watch them in their joy. Each visit allows the edge to pushed a bit more.

It is a very respectful and non-confrontation way to interact with your students, or coworkers, or even some at the store.

Next I hope cover briefly the core routines of Coyote Mentoring and how I see them fitting a counseling or teaching role.

Written on October 7th, 2010 , education, Personal Learning Tags: , , , , ,

Authored on 2007-08-12 08:54:09 -0800

I’ve never worked, or been a part of an education system, where standardized testing did not exist. I wrote the tests in grade 12. I now teach the courses that have the tests. I’ve been hired to mark exams and develop questions. There are some advantages to standardized testing. And there are disadvantages.

The strange thing is that those who defend it or criticize it both use the same reason: they want to do what is best for the students.

As I see it, testing is good for the students because it provides a baseline of skills. It clarifies what needs to be learned, understood, and able to do. It gets bad when the results are used to put pressure on schools and teachers to have “good” results. Because learning depends on the mixture of learner and teacher, this pressure gets rerouted from improving that relationship to “changing the system” so that the results look better.

A difficulty that I’m learning to deal with is counseling students into a proper education path. There is the balance of working with the student, the parents, and the teachers to make sure the student is taking the courses they need, the courses they can be successful in, and the courses that will challenge them. This is difficult enough without the added pressure of results.

Two stories came to me from Slashdot about the pressure of standardized testing on math programming. The UK is facing a problem where students are not taking math courses because of perceived difficulty. The universities are noticing the choices in that fewer students are ready for their programs. The articles does not clarify whether this is self-selection by the students or pressure from the system but the students worried about failing. This also is happening in Australia. In this article it seems clear that there is pressure from the school for the sake of results.

In helping students decide which courses to take many factors are taken into account. I admit that in some choices, there is a chance of failure. Again, many factors affect a particular student’s success – and some can be out of their control. So, given this variability, analyzing test results must be kept into context. The two articles provide evidence that my fears about testing are true. Is there evidence that testing is helping schools?

It was surprising when I was reminded of Jaime Escalante, the famous math teacher of Stand and Deliver. His success in teaching math (as measured by standardized testing) came from strong educational practices:

pipelining – students’ skills were built up through proper programming and design of courses
tutoring – help with learning was provided for the students
open enrollment – students were allowed to challenge the programs (and some did fail)
Once the focus went away from the direct focus on teaching the students the program failed

Written on August 12th, 2007 , Uncategorized Tags: , , ,

Eastern Desert is proudly powered by WordPress and the Theme Adventure by Eric Schwarz
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Eastern Desert

An educator's thoughts on life and such stuff . . .